Are we able to monitor and control success and failure ?
Back in 1989 a young student bought his first shares
in the stock exchange.
In the next 20 years he was lucky to evaluate
the potentials of around 2000 more companies in Cyprus, Greece
and the United Kingdom,
monitoring also what went wrong for those that shut down.
When the Cyprus Stock Exchange collapsed and billions of pounds were lost , without any obvious reason, that was a red flag that for an aspiring professional on fraud investigation would be repeated
As a Bachelors studies student, the same person,
made a couple of assumptions regarding the EU design, stability and future failure.
Unfortunately, today we monitor the most negative
of those scenarios happening. The people that implemented and monitored the procedures of European integration had no idea on how to do it properly. This is why today we are discussing the models of a soft disintegration.
What the outcome of the 2008 crisis has proven for sure
was that PIGS cannot fly if monitoring and controlling is left to people with limited skills and experience..
The collapse of Portugal, Italy, Greece and Spain
opened the Pandora Box
for the United Kingdom, Germany and France, but the red flags were not obvious unless you had studies and experience on the topic of Ponzi finance.
This is why today all governments wonder how to fix the problems they caused but in fact they have absolutely no idea on how to do it.
The pattern is identical and whoever can observe it, is always one step ahead but the majority of the population will pay a huge bill.
This is because both the Project Managers and the Fraud investigators failed to do their own job properly, when they should.
Ten years earlier I wrote a post regarding the upcoming problems of France. Today everyone discusses those problems but fails to understand the necessary solutions. In the meantime, the United Kingdom has left the European Union, in order to fix their own issues. This is how inevitable that choice was.
Based on the evidence, coming from cases such as
- Overend, Gurney and Company,
- Northern Rock,
- Royal Bank of Scotland,
- Lehman Brothers,
- Cyprus Popular Bank (MARFIN Laiki) Group,
- the Cyprus and the Greek bust,
and the most recent cases of :
- Wilko and
- Poundland,
I have recently created a series of modules
focused on the necessity of monitoring, controlling and re-designing,
during the periods that things go really bad.
Based on the case studies and the evidence, I follow
the routes of how the money disappears each time and
who are the organizations
that will allow the system to restart again.
This research allows the participants to understand
how important it is to make a functional design and implementation,
especially during the periods that the society needs stronger support,
in order to recover sooner.
An important module, allow my learners to understand Ponzi schemes in the 21st century era
and the importance of Hyman Minsky and the Ponzi Finance theory
in order to identify and evaluate the health condition stages of any private and public body.
As a professional on the field, I am always looking to train the organizations and the teams that plan to be the problem solvers of tomorrow and I offer the best available knowledge.
So when I read articles blaming Keir Starmer, Rachel Reeves, Emmanuel Macron I can instantly understand which parts of the analysis are accurate and which parts are misleading, based on the personal perceptions of the writer. What I could say as a general rule is that each leader brings good things among bad things, during their administration. Unfortunately, it takes too much time to evaluate whether the majority of their actions were good or bad and it’s always too late to fix the damages that were caused.
This is where Political science meets Project Management and Fraud investigation, in order to provide the best possible solution.
If you have some examples to share, please share your own comment or example.




